Skip to main content

How to Prevent Mass Shootings

Last week's mass shooting stirred up talk about gun control, school security, mental health, and our supposed culture of violence.

Here are my thoughtson how to craft effective policy responses. Maybe some nonprofits can take up the challenge and turn my line of thinking into a new lobbying effort or public education campaign.

I like to write about tools nonprofits and activists can use to generate better ideas. Two of those tools come into play here. Firstly, new ideas often come from simply asking questions. Secondly, promising ideas tend to get knocked down by "common sense" objections that reflect personal biases more than fact or logic.

Sometimes asking why things happen, then asking why again and again can lead us down a trial to a good idea. Here is a crude presentation of how asking why can lead to new ideas:

Why do mass shootings happen?

Because crazy people have access to guns.

Why do crazy people have access to guns?

Because gun laws are not strict enough

Why are gun laws not strict enough?

Because people don't demand that gun laws be made tougher

Why aren't people demanding tougher gun laws?

Maybe people simply don't understand the likely costs and benefits.

Maybe education about the likely costs and benefits of new gun laws would help. You still need to make some emotional connection because simple facts tend to be ignored or integrated into whatever worldview the person has: "Yeah, gun control might stop some people, but the others won't face armed citizens who can stop the violence."


And, of course, as always, you have to find out what people know and think before you start a public education or lobbying effort. Why waste time "selling" an idea most people accept now?

The real challenge then is to connect with people emotionally and present an accurate account of the costs and benefits of tougher gun laws. Appeal to peoples' values and show how stricter gun laws support those values. This is where persuasive writing, and speaking. become crucial.

Do a PMI:

Maybe handguns need to be banned, or not. Either way, why not consider the implications of banning handgun ownership. Edward De Bono created a tool called PMI, for Plus-Minus-Interesting, for just such a purpose!

So, let's consider in turn the pluses, minuses, and interesting points of a nationwide ban on handgun ownership. Here is my list:

Plus - suicides might decline, fewer domestic disputes might turn deadly, there would fewer accidental deaths at home. fewer handguns would be stolen and used in crimes, people would invest money in other health and safety measures. People who would buy handguns now have more disposable income for other things.

Minus - people in dangerous areas might be victimized at a higher rate; jobs would be lost as people who make handguns, holsters and pistol ammunition are not needed anymore; gun ranges and gun shops would lose lots of money. People would be angry and depressed because some "freedom" has been lost.

Interesting - people would shift spending to new interests, alarm sales might go up.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Web Strategy That Works

I was reading a Chronicle of Philanthropy article about online strategies that work in a bad economy. The article presented four different strategies and a nonprofit that used it successfully. This post is about the strategy of using specialized Web sites. Put up a site just for a certain crisis, event, issue, project or program. The Chronicle details how Partners in Health did this for Haiti earthquake relief. Any issue, whether a crisis or not, whether global or local is a potential candidate for replicating the Partners in Health approach. Events of global and local significance are fine subjects for a site. You are probably already familiar with World AIDS Day or World Water Day. Those global events and many others are the subject of special Web sites and advertising campaigns both online and in print. Local events from the mundane, like the beginning of a new school year, to the momentous. A crisis is another good reason to put up a specialized Web site. The epic flooding in...

Brainstorming for Fundraising Success

Looking for opportunities to raise more money or just to use your fundraising resources more efficiently? This post is another of a series on brainstorming and fundraising. You need three things to think creatively about fundraising. Openness to new ways of thinking is a requirement. Attitude matters in creative thinking, so you need to be positive and nonjudgmental. You also need to be familiar with one or more brainstorming tools. In recent posts I’ve described some brainstorming tools created by Edward De Bono and described in various books of his. In those posts I referred to using random ideas or objects to spark new ideas. In this post I will rely on a fantasy question, a provocation in De Bono’s terms, as a starting point. Consider this fantasy question: What if every donor supported 1000 charities? That question can potentially spark new ideas, if examined in the right way. De Bono writes about several ways of creating movement from a provocation like that question. I’ll qui...

Fundraising Ideas

Raising money is a perennial challenge for nonprofits. The Great Recession has made things tougher for some and nearly impossible for others. Your nonprofit may be working hard to deal with fundraising challenges. Traditional thinking about fundraising might lead to thinking like this - “We need to raise $600,000 more money third year. What do we need to do to make this happen?” A discussion of grant writers, fundraising consultants and mailing lists follows. There is nothing wrong with this approach. At least some of that discussion needs to happen. But, new thinking might also be needed. Lateral thinking may help you get better results. Lateral thinking is (from Wikipedia) “solving problems through an indirect and creative approach.” The point of lateral thinking is to move “sideways” to new ideas and different ways of thinking. The point of this little essay is to point out another way of approaching the subject of fundraising. Lateral thinking itself suggests a broader approach to ...