Skip to main content

A Couple of Nonprofit Success Tools

A Couple of Nonprofit Success Tools

This is a follow-up to my previous post on things I’ve learned reading Genership 1.0: Beyond Leadership Toward Liberating the Creative Soul by David Castro. This particular entry will cover the book’s suggested tools and techniques that can contribute to nonprofit success. Genership 1.0 covers two new approaches to planning and problem solving that are worth adding to any social entrepreneur’s tool kit: CoVisioning and CoThinking.

First, a definition of genership: The capacity to create with others, the community practice of creating. Castro’s book elaborates on this concept and breaks down some myths of leadership.

The old model of leadership involves one man or woman creating a vision and a strategy, maybe some tactics, and getting people to go along with that strategy. Genership is all about working with others in a shared atmosphere of figuring out what needs to be done, how it should be done, and why it needs to be done.

Creating a Shared Vision:

CoVisioning is the process of thinking with others about desired changes to reality, to paraphrase Genership 1.0. The usual tools for brainstorming and problem analysis can be useful in creating a vision. CoVisioning involves a philosophical perspective or frame of reference.

While any sensible leader will check with his or her superiors for guidance in creating a project plan, CoVisioning begs more of a group involvement in deciding what might be done. Think of collaboration instead of persuading or inspiring. For example, in lieu of urging others to “Follow me, and let’s save the Cumberland River watershed,” a CoVisioning effort might focus a group’s attention on what their part of the Cumberland River watershed could/should look like. The traditional leader might picture a certain program, perhaps one inspired by other watershed conservation efforts in other parts of the United States.

Thinking Collaboratively:

CoThinking is the art of engaging in reflective dialogue about a desired future, present circumstances and the possibilities for strategic action toward that desired future. CoThinking is a strategic planning tool; think of it as a practical counterpart to the philosophical practice of CoVisioning.

A traditional leader would create a plan and focus his or her efforts on inspiring or persuading people to adopt that plan as their own vision for a better future. CoThinking in this scenario would entail discussing the watershed area, and what might be done to make it better (cleaner, healthier, etc.). One should engage in CoThinking after either personally seeking further information about watershed conservation, or after finding an initial group to engage with that possesses a working knowledge of the subject.

Once you’ve decided to engage in CoThinking, you have access to a variety of tools for brainstorming and planning. I’ve written about provocative operations and concept mapping as tools for generating ideas.

Thinking Differently:

This stuff does require a shift in mindset, from being the leader to being the facilitator, coordinator and liaison with outside parties.


Naturally, Genership 1.0 goes into more detail about how to implement CoThinking and CoVisioning. So, regardless of whether you are the founder and leader of a small group, or a C-level executive in a major nonprofit, your position still offers opportunities for co-creating new plans and strategies.  
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Five Nonprofit Branding Tips

How do you establish a distinct identity in the minds of potential supporters? I’m glad you asked.   The Fundraising Fundamentals blog at http://www.andrewolsen.net/mark-cubans-advice-for-your-nonprofit/blog )   offered branding tips from entrepreneur Mark Cuban. Here are the tips(My comments are in parentheses): 1. Don’t make educating your donors the focus of your communications. Meet them where they are – not where you want them to be. (Don’t tell them what you want or what your mission is or what you need. Concentrate on explaining how donations or volunteering will benefit them in some way. The most obvious way to do that is to show people how their support will reduce domestic violence or clean up the river.)   2. Forget the witty, brainy, philosophical branding campaigns that are designed to “make donors think.” They don’t want to think. They want to help. Show them in simple terms how they can help. (Take the direct approach. If you are the only nonprofit supporting mic
1 comment
Read more

Steering Your Brain Toward Better Program Ideas

This is a post about asking good questions whenever you think you have a good idea for a program or program improvement. You probably knew that great ideas still need to be examined, questioned if you please. That's what this post is about, sort of. Mostly, I want to offer a few comments on Brainsteering: A Better Approach to Breakthrough Ideas by Kevin and Shawn Coyne. Brainsteering offers a disciplined approach to asking, and answering, questions about product ideas and business ideas. The process also works just fine for program ideas. The book starts by describing some generic questions to ask about a challenge then goes into creating logic trees. A logic tree works by stating a question and breaking it down into subquestions. Simply asking and answering questions might lead to some valuable new ideas. Brainsteering And that's as far as I have gone in the book. I can say that there is a chapter on making your own brainstorming efforts more effective. Other chapter
Post a Comment
Read more

Try This Simple Process for Attacking a Social Problem

This short article outlines a technique you can use to focus your efforts to solve social problems through advocacy, public education, program design, or social marketing. What follows is a framework for thinking about how best to attack a given social problem This process should be helpful whether you know what your options are or not. You'll answer a series of questions about the issue starting with the most obvious question of all.  What is the problem? What is the challenge or problem you want to tackle? This is a broad social problem, like domestic violence or climate change, or something a bit narrower. Avoid stating that the lack of a specific thing is a problem - no playground in the neighborhood, no soup kitchen in the neighborhood, and so on.  There are a few reasons for not including a solution in your problem statement. First, you were probably assuming too much about the social problem in question. You will never look at other, better ways to address hunger or bullying
Post a Comment
Read more