Skip to main content

Creative Nonprofit Leadership

This post shall be the first of  a series on leadership, using ideas drawn from David Castro's book, Genership 1.0. I'm reading it and deciding how to integrate Castro's thoughts on leadership into my thinking about creativity and problem solving in the nonprofit world.

A 2011 report from the Nonprofit Leadership Alliance listed several competencies that survey respondents said nonprofit leaders would need to pay more attention to in the future:
  • Building and leading teams
  • Developing others
  • Interpersonal skills
  • Working as an effective team member
In 2014, a new leadership competency might need to be cultivated as those challenges haven't completely gone away (and more on that in coming posts).

The point is this: Castro talks about the need for a new form of leadership that fosters collective action rather than being about “leading” people to do something. Castro describes at length what genership is and how to do it. But he starts off by talking about leadership fallacies that undermine effective action: 

1. The Messiah Fallacy
2. The Hero Fallacy
3. The Fallacy of Leadership Nostalgia

All three fallacies center on the myth of a messiah or hero who will lead the people to...something. The fundamental flaw in all cases is that the solution to a leadership challenge is hidden either in history or in the person of the chosen leader.  The hero and messiah will rescue the group and tell them how to get things done. Leadership nostalgia makes the revered leaders' long ago ideas and actions a model.

Each is a fallacy for good reason. Leadership lessons of the past might not apply in today's vastly different social environment. Pining for a hero or a messiah distracts people from working together to design a way to address the organization's challenges. This is what genership is really about. "Genership" is the capacity to create with others, the community practice of creating. 

How is that a leadership model? In short, genership is about facilitating collaboration where old-fashioned leadership is about one person telling the group what do do and why. Genership is based on co-creation, not on pulling people along toward a vision. 

You can read more about Genership 1.0 on the book page at Arch Street Press or at Amazon.com. I don't want to make this blog series into a long book report, so I'll not go into more detail on my points than absolutely necessary.

Next week: Cothinking, covisioning and a report on challenges facing nonprofits in 2014.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Steering Your Brain Toward Better Program Ideas

This is a post about asking good questions whenever you think you have a good idea for a program or program improvement. You probably knew that great ideas still need to be examined, questioned if you please. That's what this post is about, sort of. Mostly, I want to offer a few comments on Brainsteering: A Better Approach to Breakthrough Ideas by Kevin and Shawn Coyne. Brainsteering offers a disciplined approach to asking, and answering, questions about product ideas and business ideas. The process also works just fine for program ideas. The book starts by describing some generic questions to ask about a challenge then goes into creating logic trees. A logic tree works by stating a question and breaking it down into subquestions. Simply asking and answering questions might lead to some valuable new ideas. Brainsteering And that's as far as I have gone in the book. I can say that there is a chapter on making your own brainstorming efforts more effective. Other chapter...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to Crowdsource and Experiment Our Way to a Fairer Economy

Economic and social inequality should be treated as design challenges that, like designs in architecture or packaging can be solved by applying some creative thinking. That's hardly a new idea, but the recession and ongoing concerns about economic inequality make crowdsourcing seem like something worth talking about.  Crowdsourcing as an Economic Justice Tool: Most people have an idea of what  crowdsourcing is and how it works - you let a group work on your problem or challenge and see what they produce. Can they produce a better answer (whatever that means) than an expert or a small group of experts? You can't answer that question until you have some real-world examples to draw upon. That's where social experiments and simulations can prove useful. Maybe there should be specific crowdsourcing projects and a place to organize all of them. We could start crowdsourcing campaigns around a range of topics: New ways of using barter to meet peoples' needs Using buying co...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Web Strategy That Works

I was reading a Chronicle of Philanthropy article about online strategies that work in a bad economy. The article presented four different strategies and a nonprofit that used it successfully. This post is about the strategy of using specialized Web sites. Put up a site just for a certain crisis, event, issue, project or program. The Chronicle details how Partners in Health did this for Haiti earthquake relief. Any issue, whether a crisis or not, whether global or local is a potential candidate for replicating the Partners in Health approach. Events of global and local significance are fine subjects for a site. You are probably already familiar with World AIDS Day or World Water Day. Those global events and many others are the subject of special Web sites and advertising campaigns both online and in print. Local events from the mundane, like the beginning of a new school year, to the momentous. A crisis is another good reason to put up a specialized Web site. The epic flooding in...
Post a Comment
Read more