Skip to main content

Creative Nonprofit Leadership

This post shall be the first of  a series on leadership, using ideas drawn from David Castro's book, Genership 1.0. I'm reading it and deciding how to integrate Castro's thoughts on leadership into my thinking about creativity and problem solving in the nonprofit world.

A 2011 report from the Nonprofit Leadership Alliance listed several competencies that survey respondents said nonprofit leaders would need to pay more attention to in the future:
  • Building and leading teams
  • Developing others
  • Interpersonal skills
  • Working as an effective team member
In 2014, a new leadership competency might need to be cultivated as those challenges haven't completely gone away (and more on that in coming posts).

The point is this: Castro talks about the need for a new form of leadership that fosters collective action rather than being about “leading” people to do something. Castro describes at length what genership is and how to do it. But he starts off by talking about leadership fallacies that undermine effective action: 

1. The Messiah Fallacy
2. The Hero Fallacy
3. The Fallacy of Leadership Nostalgia

All three fallacies center on the myth of a messiah or hero who will lead the people to...something. The fundamental flaw in all cases is that the solution to a leadership challenge is hidden either in history or in the person of the chosen leader.  The hero and messiah will rescue the group and tell them how to get things done. Leadership nostalgia makes the revered leaders' long ago ideas and actions a model.

Each is a fallacy for good reason. Leadership lessons of the past might not apply in today's vastly different social environment. Pining for a hero or a messiah distracts people from working together to design a way to address the organization's challenges. This is what genership is really about. "Genership" is the capacity to create with others, the community practice of creating. 

How is that a leadership model? In short, genership is about facilitating collaboration where old-fashioned leadership is about one person telling the group what do do and why. Genership is based on co-creation, not on pulling people along toward a vision. 

You can read more about Genership 1.0 on the book page at Arch Street Press or at Amazon.com. I don't want to make this blog series into a long book report, so I'll not go into more detail on my points than absolutely necessary.

Next week: Cothinking, covisioning and a report on challenges facing nonprofits in 2014.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Five Nonprofit Branding Tips

How do you establish a distinct identity in the minds of potential supporters? I’m glad you asked.   The Fundraising Fundamentals blog at http://www.andrewolsen.net/mark-cubans-advice-for-your-nonprofit/blog )   offered branding tips from entrepreneur Mark Cuban. Here are the tips(My comments are in parentheses): 1. Don’t make educating your donors the focus of your communications. Meet them where they are – not where you want them to be. (Don’t tell them what you want or what your mission is or what you need. Concentrate on explaining how donations or volunteering will benefit them in some way. The most obvious way to do that is to show people how their support will reduce domestic violence or clean up the river.)   2. Forget the witty, brainy, philosophical branding campaigns that are designed to “make donors think.” They don’t want to think. They want to help. Show them in simple terms how they can help. (Take the direct approach. If you are the only nonprofit supporting mic
1 comment
Read more

Steering Your Brain Toward Better Program Ideas

This is a post about asking good questions whenever you think you have a good idea for a program or program improvement. You probably knew that great ideas still need to be examined, questioned if you please. That's what this post is about, sort of. Mostly, I want to offer a few comments on Brainsteering: A Better Approach to Breakthrough Ideas by Kevin and Shawn Coyne. Brainsteering offers a disciplined approach to asking, and answering, questions about product ideas and business ideas. The process also works just fine for program ideas. The book starts by describing some generic questions to ask about a challenge then goes into creating logic trees. A logic tree works by stating a question and breaking it down into subquestions. Simply asking and answering questions might lead to some valuable new ideas. Brainsteering And that's as far as I have gone in the book. I can say that there is a chapter on making your own brainstorming efforts more effective. Other chapter
Post a Comment
Read more

Try This Simple Process for Attacking a Social Problem

This short article outlines a technique you can use to focus your efforts to solve social problems through advocacy, public education, program design, or social marketing. What follows is a framework for thinking about how best to attack a given social problem This process should be helpful whether you know what your options are or not. You'll answer a series of questions about the issue starting with the most obvious question of all.  What is the problem? What is the challenge or problem you want to tackle? This is a broad social problem, like domestic violence or climate change, or something a bit narrower. Avoid stating that the lack of a specific thing is a problem - no playground in the neighborhood, no soup kitchen in the neighborhood, and so on.  There are a few reasons for not including a solution in your problem statement. First, you were probably assuming too much about the social problem in question. You will never look at other, better ways to address hunger or bullying
Post a Comment
Read more