Skip to main content

Creative Nonprofit Leadership

This post shall be the first of  a series on leadership, using ideas drawn from David Castro's book, Genership 1.0. I'm reading it and deciding how to integrate Castro's thoughts on leadership into my thinking about creativity and problem solving in the nonprofit world.

A 2011 report from the Nonprofit Leadership Alliance listed several competencies that survey respondents said nonprofit leaders would need to pay more attention to in the future:
  • Building and leading teams
  • Developing others
  • Interpersonal skills
  • Working as an effective team member
In 2014, a new leadership competency might need to be cultivated as those challenges haven't completely gone away (and more on that in coming posts).

The point is this: Castro talks about the need for a new form of leadership that fosters collective action rather than being about “leading” people to do something. Castro describes at length what genership is and how to do it. But he starts off by talking about leadership fallacies that undermine effective action: 

1. The Messiah Fallacy
2. The Hero Fallacy
3. The Fallacy of Leadership Nostalgia

All three fallacies center on the myth of a messiah or hero who will lead the people to...something. The fundamental flaw in all cases is that the solution to a leadership challenge is hidden either in history or in the person of the chosen leader.  The hero and messiah will rescue the group and tell them how to get things done. Leadership nostalgia makes the revered leaders' long ago ideas and actions a model.

Each is a fallacy for good reason. Leadership lessons of the past might not apply in today's vastly different social environment. Pining for a hero or a messiah distracts people from working together to design a way to address the organization's challenges. This is what genership is really about. "Genership" is the capacity to create with others, the community practice of creating. 

How is that a leadership model? In short, genership is about facilitating collaboration where old-fashioned leadership is about one person telling the group what do do and why. Genership is based on co-creation, not on pulling people along toward a vision. 

You can read more about Genership 1.0 on the book page at Arch Street Press or at Amazon.com. I don't want to make this blog series into a long book report, so I'll not go into more detail on my points than absolutely necessary.

Next week: Cothinking, covisioning and a report on challenges facing nonprofits in 2014.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Brainstorming for Fundraising Success

Looking for opportunities to raise more money or just to use your fundraising resources more efficiently? This post is another of a series on brainstorming and fundraising. You need three things to think creatively about fundraising. Openness to new ways of thinking is a requirement. Attitude matters in creative thinking, so you need to be positive and nonjudgmental. You also need to be familiar with one or more brainstorming tools. In recent posts I’ve described some brainstorming tools created by Edward De Bono and described in various books of his. In those posts I referred to using random ideas or objects to spark new ideas. In this post I will rely on a fantasy question, a provocation in De Bono’s terms, as a starting point. Consider this fantasy question: What if every donor supported 1000 charities? That question can potentially spark new ideas, if examined in the right way. De Bono writes about several ways of creating movement from a provocation like that question. I’ll qui...
Post a Comment
Read more

Setting Good Social Change Goals: The Problem of Police Brutality

No one in the United States can say they are totally ignorant of the issues surrounding last week's death of Black Minneapolis resident George Floyd at the hands of a police officer. This post is not about the incident, which has been covered in great depth by others. This post is about setting goals to pursue in the wake of Floyd's high-profile death.  What do protestors want, exactly? This is probably unknowable right now. Sure, they call for justice or for an end to police brutality, maybe in those exact words. Each one of those goals has a huge problem. Let's see why. What does justice look like exactly? Will you know when justice has been served? Theoretically, some felony convictions for the involved officers would work. Right? Maybe.  The goal of ending police brutality is far more problematic. How can we ever achieve a state of affairs where no cop ever abuses any suspect? That is what an end to police brutality might look like. Achieving perfection is a bit too amb...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to Think About Social Problems, Part I

Whenever a problem like gun violence or illegal immigration gains traction in the media, you'll find people misrepresenting the problem. The world is full of uninformed people, but the world is also full of dishonest actors trying to "sell" an idea. This post is the first of several where I will try to help the curious reader defend themselves from the fools and con artists and understand social problems, for real.  Confirmation bias is just the tendency to look for information that confirms what we already know or think. Everyone wants to be right, and the more important the subject is, the more the person wants to continue being right. Information that shows we're right gets more weight than information showing we are wrong. So, with that psychological note in mind, let's look at the outline of a formula for thinking about social problems.  Abusing Statistics - Raw Numbers A real thinker always gives numbers a context and always uses the right kind of numbers. A...
Post a Comment
Read more