Skip to main content

Leadership Tools for New Social Ventures

David Castro's book Genership 1.0: Beyond Leadership Toward Liberating the Creative Soul offers some thoughts on leadership that can be valuable to new social ventures in particular. Bad assumptions, the quest for salvation and barriers to effective group thinking could all undermine a social venture.

Assumptions in Social Venture Planning:

New social ventures should proceed on sound assumptions. This statement should sound familiar and obvious. Putting an idea into practice— by testing assumptions and rejecting the bad ones—does not always happen. This fact is evident in how individuals in organizations plan and solve problems.

Castro reminds us that the past might not be a reliable guide for the present. He points out that past experiences often don't translate because the current social environment is not like the past social environment. This is only a problem when social entrepreneurs forget that what worked for their heroes and mentors thirty years ago may no longer be applicable.

Assuming that lessons learned in the past are still useful is one thing, but not the only thing. Other assumptions about technology, human relations and economics might no longer apply. Indeed assumptions about the way to structure a new organization or program might not apply. That's not to say most learning from the past needs to be ignored; just revisit anything critical to the new enterprise.

Looking for Salvation:

Many times a group with a big challenge will look outside for some guru or champion who can fix things. This is a real recipe for problems according to Castro's analysis of leadership fallacies. Wise social entrepreneurs will focus on resources that are already available to the group: ideas, creativity and specialized knowledge.

A management guru, strategy consultant or big donor will not save the day either. Or, at least the wise entrepreneur would not want to depend on that. Social venture groups need to save themselves instead of looking for a nonprofit savior.

Thinking at the Right Level:

The level of thinking that group members are at can be a serious barrier to effective thinking. Castro writes about four levels of thinking that might exist in an organization.

Sheep do not think much—about thinking or anything. Sheep just do things reflexively and therefore have little desire to create anything new and useful or to come up with better ways to solve problems. Sheep-like thinking in a social venture leads to nonproductive behavior. Social ventures are not likely to germinate from group thinking at this level.

Groupthink is the second level of thinking in a group. Having everyone “on the same page” is important, but it runs the risk of prompting everyone to go along with ideas that are not necessarily the best ideas. Real discussion about challenges and opportunities may not happen at this level of thinking.

The next step up in effective thinking comes when group members start to debate things. At this level of thinking, people begin to question ideas and opinions and defend their own ideas about what the group should do. This level of thinking allows room for some innovation and learning, but real progress might still beg a higher level of group thinking.

A high-functioning group will have members who prefer to engage in dialogue, a mutual exploration of a subject. Dialogue leaves room for some disagreement and argument, but the group members are committed to working together and “figuring things out” in whatever form that activity might take. This is the state of affairs the founders of a social venture should aim for.

Leadership Challenges Have Solutions:

Any effort to start a new program, movement or charity will be full of challenges with which effective leadership or collaboration will be difficult. Ineffective thinking just makes things more difficult. Future posts will explore effective thinking in social ventures in more detail. Castro's ideas on effective thinking—and the barriers to it—can help prompt more honest exploration of a path toward dynamic and successful social ventures.



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Web Strategy That Works

I was reading a Chronicle of Philanthropy article about online strategies that work in a bad economy. The article presented four different strategies and a nonprofit that used it successfully. This post is about the strategy of using specialized Web sites. Put up a site just for a certain crisis, event, issue, project or program. The Chronicle details how Partners in Health did this for Haiti earthquake relief. Any issue, whether a crisis or not, whether global or local is a potential candidate for replicating the Partners in Health approach. Events of global and local significance are fine subjects for a site. You are probably already familiar with World AIDS Day or World Water Day. Those global events and many others are the subject of special Web sites and advertising campaigns both online and in print. Local events from the mundane, like the beginning of a new school year, to the momentous. A crisis is another good reason to put up a specialized Web site. The epic flooding in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Steering Your Brain Toward Better Program Ideas

This is a post about asking good questions whenever you think you have a good idea for a program or program improvement. You probably knew that great ideas still need to be examined, questioned if you please. That's what this post is about, sort of. Mostly, I want to offer a few comments on Brainsteering: A Better Approach to Breakthrough Ideas by Kevin and Shawn Coyne. Brainsteering offers a disciplined approach to asking, and answering, questions about product ideas and business ideas. The process also works just fine for program ideas. The book starts by describing some generic questions to ask about a challenge then goes into creating logic trees. A logic tree works by stating a question and breaking it down into subquestions. Simply asking and answering questions might lead to some valuable new ideas. Brainsteering And that's as far as I have gone in the book. I can say that there is a chapter on making your own brainstorming efforts more effective. Other chapter...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to Crowdsource and Experiment Our Way to a Fairer Economy

Economic and social inequality should be treated as design challenges that, like designs in architecture or packaging can be solved by applying some creative thinking. That's hardly a new idea, but the recession and ongoing concerns about economic inequality make crowdsourcing seem like something worth talking about.  Crowdsourcing as an Economic Justice Tool: Most people have an idea of what  crowdsourcing is and how it works - you let a group work on your problem or challenge and see what they produce. Can they produce a better answer (whatever that means) than an expert or a small group of experts? You can't answer that question until you have some real-world examples to draw upon. That's where social experiments and simulations can prove useful. Maybe there should be specific crowdsourcing projects and a place to organize all of them. We could start crowdsourcing campaigns around a range of topics: New ways of using barter to meet peoples' needs Using buying co...
Post a Comment
Read more