Skip to main content

Leadership Tools for New Social Ventures

David Castro's book Genership 1.0: Beyond Leadership Toward Liberating the Creative Soul offers some thoughts on leadership that can be valuable to new social ventures in particular. Bad assumptions, the quest for salvation and barriers to effective group thinking could all undermine a social venture.

Assumptions in Social Venture Planning:

New social ventures should proceed on sound assumptions. This statement should sound familiar and obvious. Putting an idea into practice— by testing assumptions and rejecting the bad ones—does not always happen. This fact is evident in how individuals in organizations plan and solve problems.

Castro reminds us that the past might not be a reliable guide for the present. He points out that past experiences often don't translate because the current social environment is not like the past social environment. This is only a problem when social entrepreneurs forget that what worked for their heroes and mentors thirty years ago may no longer be applicable.

Assuming that lessons learned in the past are still useful is one thing, but not the only thing. Other assumptions about technology, human relations and economics might no longer apply. Indeed assumptions about the way to structure a new organization or program might not apply. That's not to say most learning from the past needs to be ignored; just revisit anything critical to the new enterprise.

Looking for Salvation:

Many times a group with a big challenge will look outside for some guru or champion who can fix things. This is a real recipe for problems according to Castro's analysis of leadership fallacies. Wise social entrepreneurs will focus on resources that are already available to the group: ideas, creativity and specialized knowledge.

A management guru, strategy consultant or big donor will not save the day either. Or, at least the wise entrepreneur would not want to depend on that. Social venture groups need to save themselves instead of looking for a nonprofit savior.

Thinking at the Right Level:

The level of thinking that group members are at can be a serious barrier to effective thinking. Castro writes about four levels of thinking that might exist in an organization.

Sheep do not think much—about thinking or anything. Sheep just do things reflexively and therefore have little desire to create anything new and useful or to come up with better ways to solve problems. Sheep-like thinking in a social venture leads to nonproductive behavior. Social ventures are not likely to germinate from group thinking at this level.

Groupthink is the second level of thinking in a group. Having everyone “on the same page” is important, but it runs the risk of prompting everyone to go along with ideas that are not necessarily the best ideas. Real discussion about challenges and opportunities may not happen at this level of thinking.

The next step up in effective thinking comes when group members start to debate things. At this level of thinking, people begin to question ideas and opinions and defend their own ideas about what the group should do. This level of thinking allows room for some innovation and learning, but real progress might still beg a higher level of group thinking.

A high-functioning group will have members who prefer to engage in dialogue, a mutual exploration of a subject. Dialogue leaves room for some disagreement and argument, but the group members are committed to working together and “figuring things out” in whatever form that activity might take. This is the state of affairs the founders of a social venture should aim for.

Leadership Challenges Have Solutions:

Any effort to start a new program, movement or charity will be full of challenges with which effective leadership or collaboration will be difficult. Ineffective thinking just makes things more difficult. Future posts will explore effective thinking in social ventures in more detail. Castro's ideas on effective thinking—and the barriers to it—can help prompt more honest exploration of a path toward dynamic and successful social ventures.



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to Crowdsource and Experiment Our Way to a Fairer Economy

Economic and social inequality should be treated as design challenges that, like designs in architecture or packaging can be solved by applying some creative thinking. That's hardly a new idea, but the recession and ongoing concerns about economic inequality make crowdsourcing seem like something worth talking about.  Crowdsourcing as an Economic Justice Tool: Most people have an idea of what  crowdsourcing is and how it works - you let a group work on your problem or challenge and see what they produce. Can they produce a better answer (whatever that means) than an expert or a small group of experts? You can't answer that question until you have some real-world examples to draw upon. That's where social experiments and simulations can prove useful. Maybe there should be specific crowdsourcing projects and a place to organize all of them. We could start crowdsourcing campaigns around a range of topics: New ways of using barter to meet peoples' needs Using buying co...
Post a Comment
Read more

Setting Good Social Change Goals: The Problem of Police Brutality

No one in the United States can say they are totally ignorant of the issues surrounding last week's death of Black Minneapolis resident George Floyd at the hands of a police officer. This post is not about the incident, which has been covered in great depth by others. This post is about setting goals to pursue in the wake of Floyd's high-profile death.  What do protestors want, exactly? This is probably unknowable right now. Sure, they call for justice or for an end to police brutality, maybe in those exact words. Each one of those goals has a huge problem. Let's see why. What does justice look like exactly? Will you know when justice has been served? Theoretically, some felony convictions for the involved officers would work. Right? Maybe.  The goal of ending police brutality is far more problematic. How can we ever achieve a state of affairs where no cop ever abuses any suspect? That is what an end to police brutality might look like. Achieving perfection is a bit too amb...
Post a Comment
Read more

Exploring A Challenge

If you want to solve a problem, have to stop and think about the problem first. Logical, right?  Whether you want to tackle racial inequality, gun violence, climate change, or homelessness in your city you need to explore the challenge. Take notes, ask questions, do some interviews, reflect. This post introduces a couple of techniques you can use to focus on a new (to you) problem. You can use the tools here to help you shift your focus, or reevaluate whether you're focusing on the right thing.  Say your interest is climate change. Maybe you've decided that getting people to consume less stuff is the key to reducing the effects of climate change in the future. If you don't know much about the problem, here are a few key points: 1. The world is warming up with alarming speed, mainly because of human activity.  2. We may not be able to prevent some major changes like a 1-meter rise in sea level and permanent drought 3. Some would argue that adapting to those changes is more...
Post a Comment
Read more