Skip to main content

Is the Bandwagon Effect Undermining Nonprofits?

Fundraising for breast cancer, the ALS ice bucket challenge, and now the campaign against "rape culture" on college campuses are nonprofit strategy ideas that strive to address important issues. That is not the issue. This issue is that time and money are being diverted from other issues that have a greater impact on people's lives.

What is the number one killer of people in the United States? Heart disease. The fight against heart disease was the biggest target of donations last year? Nope. That was breast cancer. More money was raised to fight breast cancer, the fifth most common cause of death in America. A graphic from iflscience.com illustrates the imbalance between funds raised and deaths caused.

Nonprofit Strategy: Different Animals, Same Problem:

Stopping breast cancer is a very different sort of cause than fighting sexual violence or campaigning against racism. One is mostly a technical challenge, of creating better cures and treatments. The other is a label that covers several issues that are cultural and psychological and that exist all over the country. A new education program at a college in Maine doesn't help students in California. A breast cancer treatment developed in California, can be used in Maine. But a university in California has to replicate the Maine education program or create something similar,

In the case of a scientific or technical challenge like eradicating a disease, the bandwagon effect tends to divert funding away from the most important diseases or conditions to whatever disease or condition has a high-profile spokesperson at the moment. To the extent that diseases can be prevented, or the impact reduced, by lifestyle changes, you will find less money and education time being devoted to those efforts.

Many cases of diabetes and heart disease could be prevented with lifestyle changes, whereas there is probably nothing to be done about breast cancer or prostate cancer.

Cool Versus Effective:

Any nonprofit strategy for social marketing or advocacy has to have some promise of being effective. That should be obvious, but dubious ideas do seem to take hold quite often. Is spending a huge amount of time and money on teaching people about consent undermining other efforts to reduce the risk of sexual violence get less attention. A hashtag campaign #nomeansno makes people feel good, but does nothing. At least tweeting an opinion and a hashtag takes no money and minimal effort.

What steps that are realistic to take might actual reduce the risk of sexual violence on campus? That should be the most important question. Activists should invest their time and money in doing those things. Feel-good social marketing campaigns like "No Means No" will do little. What about the school's process for handling sexual assault allegations? Is it effective and easy for victims to navigate? Probably not. There's something that will be effective, but not cool. There's no rush of excitement and no thrill of accomplishment in setting up a meeting with the college President or in trying to get an item on the agenda at the next Board of Regents meeting.

Get off the Bandwagon:

Better to not get on in the first place. Think about what you want to do (Keep people from getting diabetes, reducing sexual assault on campus) and how to do that. The best nonprofit strategy may involve copying someone else's idea, but this isn't always so.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Five Nonprofit Branding Tips

How do you establish a distinct identity in the minds of potential supporters? I’m glad you asked.   The Fundraising Fundamentals blog at http://www.andrewolsen.net/mark-cubans-advice-for-your-nonprofit/blog )   offered branding tips from entrepreneur Mark Cuban. Here are the tips(My comments are in parentheses): 1. Don’t make educating your donors the focus of your communications. Meet them where they are – not where you want them to be. (Don’t tell them what you want or what your mission is or what you need. Concentrate on explaining how donations or volunteering will benefit them in some way. The most obvious way to do that is to show people how their support will reduce domestic violence or clean up the river.)   2. Forget the witty, brainy, philosophical branding campaigns that are designed to “make donors think.” They don’t want to think. They want to help. Show them in simple terms how they can help. (Take the direct approach. If you are the only nonprofit supporting mic

Steering Your Brain Toward Better Program Ideas

This is a post about asking good questions whenever you think you have a good idea for a program or program improvement. You probably knew that great ideas still need to be examined, questioned if you please. That's what this post is about, sort of. Mostly, I want to offer a few comments on Brainsteering: A Better Approach to Breakthrough Ideas by Kevin and Shawn Coyne. Brainsteering offers a disciplined approach to asking, and answering, questions about product ideas and business ideas. The process also works just fine for program ideas. The book starts by describing some generic questions to ask about a challenge then goes into creating logic trees. A logic tree works by stating a question and breaking it down into subquestions. Simply asking and answering questions might lead to some valuable new ideas. Brainsteering And that's as far as I have gone in the book. I can say that there is a chapter on making your own brainstorming efforts more effective. Other chapter

Try This Simple Process for Attacking a Social Problem

This short article outlines a technique you can use to focus your efforts to solve social problems through advocacy, public education, program design, or social marketing. What follows is a framework for thinking about how best to attack a given social problem This process should be helpful whether you know what your options are or not. You'll answer a series of questions about the issue starting with the most obvious question of all.  What is the problem? What is the challenge or problem you want to tackle? This is a broad social problem, like domestic violence or climate change, or something a bit narrower. Avoid stating that the lack of a specific thing is a problem - no playground in the neighborhood, no soup kitchen in the neighborhood, and so on.  There are a few reasons for not including a solution in your problem statement. First, you were probably assuming too much about the social problem in question. You will never look at other, better ways to address hunger or bullying