Skip to main content

Speaking to the Concerns of Trump Supporters

If you want to promote social change, then you have to speak to the needs of your audience, speaking to the concerns of Trump supporters has to be part of that. Why? Marketing 101: Sell people something they say they need. You can create a need for universal basic income, a $15/hr minimum wage, or protection for LGBT workers. But, if your audience isn't interested in hearing about that, there's a huge problem. If you have a marketing team and $2 million annual communication budget, then maybe there's not much of a problem.

The following comments seem to apply mainly to political nonprofits, those that advocate for liberal or progressive policies. That would be correct. However, I think a wide range of issues can be framed in terms that speak to fiscally or socially conservative voters.

This Topic Dues Not Apply to My Organization:

I bet it does. Some nonprofits are about as nonpolitical as they can be, historic preservation organizations for example. Even if you would never even think of touching on national politics in your fundraising materials, there is probably some reason to look at the concerns of Trump voters. Depending on where you are, a third or more of adults voted for Donald Trump because they supported his message on national security, trade, jobs, immigration, and so on. Those four things probably swung the vote in Trump's favor for millions of voters.

This isn't a blog about political analysis, so I'll leave it at that. The point here is that Trump supporters are potential donors and may be constituents of yours without their even realizing it. Think of the situation as an opportunity: What does your organization do that overlaps with the interests of Trump voters?

You'll want to step back and answer a couple of more questions before that one though.

The Main Concerns of Trump Supporters:

I don't know exactly what they are, and I bet most communications people in liberal or progressive social change organizations don't know either. Unless I'm mistaken in your case, your first task is to look at what Trump supporters want. In a large nonprofit this might be a nationwide effort. In a city or in a region of a state you need to find out what area Trump supporters really want:

  • What are their priorities? 
  • What are their concerns about public safety, jobs, or whatever? 
  • What programs or resources do you have that might be relevant to one of those concerns?

I'm not saying your social services charity should start a crime prevention program just to mollify Trump supporters. Instead, what you could do is a bit more subtle, less resource-intensive, probably far more effective.

And never forget that everyone has the same basic values and interests - health, job security, family, financial security, a clean local environment, stuff like that. If your work is in any way relevant to one of those values, you have a built-in way to speak to the interests of socially and fiscally conservative individuals.

Finally, if you haven't yet subscribed to Chronicle of Philanthropy, consider doing so. This post was inspired by a recent article on the exact topic described in my title. If you are a subscriber the editorial I linked, will give you more ideas for speaking to Trump voters instead of simply attacking Trump and his policies. These tactics would appeal to your base, but kill any real chance you have of reaching conservative and moderate citizens.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Five Nonprofit Branding Tips

How do you establish a distinct identity in the minds of potential supporters? I’m glad you asked.   The Fundraising Fundamentals blog at http://www.andrewolsen.net/mark-cubans-advice-for-your-nonprofit/blog )   offered branding tips from entrepreneur Mark Cuban. Here are the tips(My comments are in parentheses): 1. Don’t make educating your donors the focus of your communications. Meet them where they are – not where you want them to be. (Don’t tell them what you want or what your mission is or what you need. Concentrate on explaining how donations or volunteering will benefit them in some way. The most obvious way to do that is to show people how their support will reduce domestic violence or clean up the river.)   2. Forget the witty, brainy, philosophical branding campaigns that are designed to “make donors think.” They don’t want to think. They want to help. Show them in simple terms how they can help. (Take the direct approach. If you are the only nonprofit supporting mic

Steering Your Brain Toward Better Program Ideas

This is a post about asking good questions whenever you think you have a good idea for a program or program improvement. You probably knew that great ideas still need to be examined, questioned if you please. That's what this post is about, sort of. Mostly, I want to offer a few comments on Brainsteering: A Better Approach to Breakthrough Ideas by Kevin and Shawn Coyne. Brainsteering offers a disciplined approach to asking, and answering, questions about product ideas and business ideas. The process also works just fine for program ideas. The book starts by describing some generic questions to ask about a challenge then goes into creating logic trees. A logic tree works by stating a question and breaking it down into subquestions. Simply asking and answering questions might lead to some valuable new ideas. Brainsteering And that's as far as I have gone in the book. I can say that there is a chapter on making your own brainstorming efforts more effective. Other chapter

Try This Simple Process for Attacking a Social Problem

This short article outlines a technique you can use to focus your efforts to solve social problems through advocacy, public education, program design, or social marketing. What follows is a framework for thinking about how best to attack a given social problem This process should be helpful whether you know what your options are or not. You'll answer a series of questions about the issue starting with the most obvious question of all.  What is the problem? What is the challenge or problem you want to tackle? This is a broad social problem, like domestic violence or climate change, or something a bit narrower. Avoid stating that the lack of a specific thing is a problem - no playground in the neighborhood, no soup kitchen in the neighborhood, and so on.  There are a few reasons for not including a solution in your problem statement. First, you were probably assuming too much about the social problem in question. You will never look at other, better ways to address hunger or bullying