Skip to main content

A Powerful Tool for Nonprofit Planning 2

This is the time for another post on the social environment of nonprofit organizations. Yes, I know this is a bit esoteric and complex. I’m just going to break things down into a few (more) concrete) posts.

Last time I mentioned that your organization’s environment has seven dimensions, each with three elements – capacity, rate of change, complexity.

I know I mentioned strategy before, but consider also fundraising, social marketing, and advocacy strategy.

To make it easier, here is the table I presented last time:

CAPACITY COMPLEXITY DYNAMISM
CULTURE
ECOLOGY ?
ECONOMIC ?
DEMOGRAPHIC
LEGAL
POLITICAL ?
TECHNOLOGICAL ?

Because 7 X 3 = 21 there are at least that many questions you could ask about your organization’s environment. Last time I posed some generic strategy questions based on the above table. This time I just want to offer some more questions based on the seven dimensions and three elements.

From the political capacity cell comes this question: What is the potential for federal grant money in the next few years?

Technological capacity raises this question: How many tools do we have available to use alone or in concert with other tools? At the risk of making things too esoteric here I want to point out technologies can be hardware, software, processes, or tools. The process I'm trying to describe here is s technology too

The economic capacity cell raises an obvious question: What is the distribution of household income around here (wherever “here“ is for your organization)?

The ecological dynamism cell leads to this question: Is there anything happening in the natural environment, to forests or water or habitat or the built environment that our organization could take advantage of?

In future posts, I’ll offer more thoughts on how to use these questions by way of a few concrete examples. I’ll also offer a few more questions. In the end, I plan to present a really big table with several dozen questions about the social environment.

In the meantime, why don’t you try to come up with some new questions of your own?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Crowdsource and Experiment Our Way to a Fairer Economy

Economic and social inequality should be treated as design challenges that, like designs in architecture or packaging can be solved by applying some creative thinking. That's hardly a new idea, but the recession and ongoing concerns about economic inequality make crowdsourcing seem like something worth talking about.  Crowdsourcing as an Economic Justice Tool: Most people have an idea of what  crowdsourcing is and how it works - you let a group work on your problem or challenge and see what they produce. Can they produce a better answer (whatever that means) than an expert or a small group of experts? You can't answer that question until you have some real-world examples to draw upon. That's where social experiments and simulations can prove useful. Maybe there should be specific crowdsourcing projects and a place to organize all of them. We could start crowdsourcing campaigns around a range of topics: New ways of using barter to meet peoples' needs Using buying co...

Setting Good Social Change Goals: The Problem of Police Brutality

No one in the United States can say they are totally ignorant of the issues surrounding last week's death of Black Minneapolis resident George Floyd at the hands of a police officer. This post is not about the incident, which has been covered in great depth by others. This post is about setting goals to pursue in the wake of Floyd's high-profile death.  What do protestors want, exactly? This is probably unknowable right now. Sure, they call for justice or for an end to police brutality, maybe in those exact words. Each one of those goals has a huge problem. Let's see why. What does justice look like exactly? Will you know when justice has been served? Theoretically, some felony convictions for the involved officers would work. Right? Maybe.  The goal of ending police brutality is far more problematic. How can we ever achieve a state of affairs where no cop ever abuses any suspect? That is what an end to police brutality might look like. Achieving perfection is a bit too amb...

A Technique for Generating Fundraising Ideas

I’ll return to the subject of strategic planning for nonprofits later. For now, I want to introduce another technique for generating ideas, for fundraising, planning, program design, advocacy, and other things. The Filament Technique was created by Edward De Bono, guru of creative thinking, and described in Serious Creativity . The technique is pretty easy to understand so I will just jump into demonstrating it with a nonprofit example. We start by defining a creative focus. In this case I want to focus to securing donations. You could also focus on fundraising generally or on another aspect of fundraising. The process is exactly the same. Having decided on the creative focus of “securing donations” I next need to list some of the normal requirements of securing donations. Here is my list: Potential donors Compelling case for donations Printed materials Objectives Note that those requirements are kept pretty broad. That was done on purpose. The list above is meant to be an illustrati...