The recent CVS announcement that the chain would stop selling tobacco products, prompted some thoughts on how best to reduce tobacco use. Public education and advocacy are sometimes put to good use, at least it seems that way. I wonder if some lateral thinking, or just some systematic investigation of the topic can lead to some better programs? The CVS decision may spark the desire to lobby other firms, to get them to stop carrying tobacco products too. This approach might appeal to activists, but has some challenges: 1. Access to decision makers 2. Shareholder concerns over profits 3. Lack of an alternative source of revenue, that makes sense for that business 4. C-level executives' natural conservatism about changing business strategy So, maybe working on corporate executives is not the best possible tactic. Maybe reducing the number of places that sell tobacco, through pressure is not the best strategy at all. What other strategies and tactics might be available? Othe...
This a blog about lateral thinking, SWOT analysis, problem solving, and brainstorming for advocacy, nonprofit strategy, fundraising, and program design.