Skip to main content

Random Fundraising Ideas

I was reading about creative ways to generate new ideas yesterday. The subject was “provocations” and the book was Serious Creativity by Edward De Bono. A provocation, or provocative operation, is just a deliberate step taken to break out of the normal ways of thinking about things. A fundraising example will help to illustrate.

De Bono writes about several types of provocations. I’ll focus here on three: reversal, wishful thinking, and exaggeration. A reversal is just about what it sounds like, a reversal of an assumption. Wishful thinking is just a fantasy statement that relates to the situation for which you need new ideas. Exaggeration takes one element of the situation and magnifies it or minimizes it.

With each type of provocation the point is not to create a perfect idea, but just to get the seeds of useful new ideas. As usual with brainstorming most of the ideas will be worthless or will need lots of work.

Reversals

Let’s see how these provocations would work for fundraising. I’ll start with a reversal, for no particular reason. The first step here is to take some assumptions about fundraising and reverse the. We assume that a nonprofit will appeal to many donors. We also assume that donors are going to give us money. Reverse these assumptions like so:

Nonprofits only have one donor each.
We give money to donors.

Take a minute to think about each of these reversals. You might just come up with the beginnings of a cool new fundraising idea.

Wishful Thinking

Wishful thinking could take two forms. You can just make a statement that’s obviously contrary to facts – “We never run out of money.” You could also ask a fantasy question: “What if in-kind contributions grew on trees?” Take a minute to see if you get any ideas that might be workable for your nonprofit, then go on and read about my crazy idea.

The question prompted the beginnings of an idea. This idea was prompted by thinking about trees in a relatively straightforward way. Perhaps farmers could donate land or produce to sell or bake. You could get a farmer or rancher to let you plant trees on marginal land that’s otherwise not doing much. The trees could be varieties that produce any number or products.

Exaggeration

Just pick an element of whatever subject you are thinking about then make that element MUCH bigger, smaller, or whatever change makes sense. The most important element in fundraising might be the existence of potential donors. Donors sometimes support more than one organization. So, let’s wildly exaggerate this relationship: Each donor supports 1000 nonprofits.

One thousand is much more than a couple dozen, so how would my idea really be implemented. Maybe there could be an “eBay of social entrepreneurship” where people could shop for products and services from hundreds of nonprofits. Maybe there could be actual auctions run by nonprofits too. A coalition of nonprofits could run virtual stores on Yahoo or eBay.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Using SWOT Analysis to Rev Up Your Fundraising

Strategic planning, including SWOT analysis, is for small nonprofits, giant philanthropic foundations, and every other nonprofit. Every nonprofit that seeks financial support of any kind needs a strategy.  The point is to make a plan and work the plan. Business gurus have shared a bunch of strategic planning tools, some generic and some made for a specific purpose. This post is about looking at your Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats - SWOT.  Knowing about your organization's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats is step one in planning your fundraising efforts.  SWOT - A Quick Review This is not the best place to run through SWOT analysis, but an overview will make it obvious why we need to do it. First, however, you should write down your fundraising goal. Then, you can do some analysis. Here are the steps: Strengths - What about your financial resources? What about your reputation and your connections? How big is your audience on social medi...

Program Design Tips That Really Work

Program Design Are there better ways to start or improve nonprofit programs? This blog is about building better nonprofits, so you probably hope I'll have more answers than questions. I do. I've written about many brainstorming techniques that you might be able to employ generically for dealing with any nonprofit challenge. This post summarizes some of those ideas and explains how to apply them to program design. A simple desire to challenge ideas, assumptions, and requirements would be a good place to start. What are the assumptions and usual requirements for a certain type of program? Write them down and examine each one to see if it is valid. Verify that each requirement is really a requirement now, and not a bad assumption or an outmoded idea. Spend about 10 minutes on this exercise.. Break down program design into component parts and look at each of the components. using either stratals or the filament technique. The filament technique calls for writing down the us...

9 Ways Cognitive Bias Undermines Social Change Efforts

This is going to be the first of many posts on how cognitive bias might undermine social change efforts. Yeah, I know. I will do my best to keep this concrete and interesting. A number of quirks in how our brains work might lead to mistaken judgments in many areas relevant to social change: problem analysis, strategy, program design, and advocacy. Maybe fundraising. Taking effective action on a certain problem is what activists want to do, so we'll come back to fundraising later. 1.Confirmation bias may cause us to look for reasons why a certain strategy or tactic is the right one. Supportive evidence gets woven into the narrative, lending support to the need for more education for women or more gun control or whatever the topic might be. Negative information gets tossed out. 2. Bandwagon effect -This may be a real problem when the resources devoted to addressing an issue get all of proportion to the seriousness of an issue. Instead, bandwagon jumping siphons away money and v...