Skip to main content

Stepping Stones to Better Programs

This post is about another creative thinking tool, this time applied to designing programs for nonprofits. I want to walk you through a few ways that NGOs can design or improve programs with a bit of applied creativity.

Edward De Bono (yes, him again) developed the use of “provocations” or “provocative operations” to help people break away from normal patterns of thinking. De Bono also invented the word “po” to introduce provocations. I’ll use po here as if it were a word people use every day so bear with me a moment.

De Bono created several types of provocations, the “stepping stone” being the one I want to focus on today. A stepping stone provocation helps us move from our current thinking to a radically different way of thinking, by way of an interim step. The interim step is a provocation is a forced switch to a different way of thinking. The end point is, we hope, a creative new way of doing whatever the program does.

The first stepping stone provocation is called a reversal because you force yourself to reverse the usual process in some way. In program design, a reversal provocation might look like this:

Po, programs are designed with no possible client base.

This reverses the usual process of investigating who needs what services then designing a program to meet their needs. Think about that provocation and your organization, or interests and see if a new program design comes to you.

An exaggeration provocation is a maximizing or minimizing of the characteristics relevant to a program. Nonprofits often have three or four programs, and a few dozen to a few thousand clients/consumers/customers. Most programs have one major goal, like getting teen mothers ready for job hunting. Exaggeration would have us thinking something like this:

Po, each client has 1000 programs.

The fact that this is absurd is actually the point. You can’t get anywhere by thinking about having five programs on offer instead of three. But, if there are 1000 programs you start to think about how this could be done.

Maybe there is a kiosk that walks clients through many options at each of several steps in getting off welfare. There could be as many as 1000 customized programs at that agency, once all possible combinations of options get counted. Program assistants or counselors could help clients use the kiosks and complete the activities in their customized program.

A distortion is a stepping stone provocation that involves changing the normal relationship or the normal sequence of events. Here is the only distortion that came to mind tonight:

Po, clients and staff design programs.

That idea just might be strange enough to prompt a useful idea. What do you think?
A wishful thinking provocation is simply a fantasy statement or question. The point is to be wildly unrealistic. Here is a statement obviously out of touch with reality:

Po, welfare recipients get rich.

That’s not likely to happen. It is possible that this provocation could yield a useful idea. See if you can come up with something. It might help to think about what it means to be rich. Consider how welfare recipients could meet their needs without money or credit.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Using SWOT Analysis to Rev Up Your Fundraising

Strategic planning, including SWOT analysis, is for small nonprofits, giant philanthropic foundations, and every other nonprofit. Every nonprofit that seeks financial support of any kind needs a strategy.  The point is to make a plan and work the plan. Business gurus have shared a bunch of strategic planning tools, some generic and some made for a specific purpose. This post is about looking at your Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats - SWOT.  Knowing about your organization's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats is step one in planning your fundraising efforts.  SWOT - A Quick Review This is not the best place to run through SWOT analysis, but an overview will make it obvious why we need to do it. First, however, you should write down your fundraising goal. Then, you can do some analysis. Here are the steps: Strengths - What about your financial resources? What about your reputation and your connections? How big is your audience on social medi...

Program Design Tips That Really Work

Program Design Are there better ways to start or improve nonprofit programs? This blog is about building better nonprofits, so you probably hope I'll have more answers than questions. I do. I've written about many brainstorming techniques that you might be able to employ generically for dealing with any nonprofit challenge. This post summarizes some of those ideas and explains how to apply them to program design. A simple desire to challenge ideas, assumptions, and requirements would be a good place to start. What are the assumptions and usual requirements for a certain type of program? Write them down and examine each one to see if it is valid. Verify that each requirement is really a requirement now, and not a bad assumption or an outmoded idea. Spend about 10 minutes on this exercise.. Break down program design into component parts and look at each of the components. using either stratals or the filament technique. The filament technique calls for writing down the us...

9 Ways Cognitive Bias Undermines Social Change Efforts

This is going to be the first of many posts on how cognitive bias might undermine social change efforts. Yeah, I know. I will do my best to keep this concrete and interesting. A number of quirks in how our brains work might lead to mistaken judgments in many areas relevant to social change: problem analysis, strategy, program design, and advocacy. Maybe fundraising. Taking effective action on a certain problem is what activists want to do, so we'll come back to fundraising later. 1.Confirmation bias may cause us to look for reasons why a certain strategy or tactic is the right one. Supportive evidence gets woven into the narrative, lending support to the need for more education for women or more gun control or whatever the topic might be. Negative information gets tossed out. 2. Bandwagon effect -This may be a real problem when the resources devoted to addressing an issue get all of proportion to the seriousness of an issue. Instead, bandwagon jumping siphons away money and v...