Skip to main content

Creative Nonprofit Leadership

This post shall be the first of  a series on leadership, using ideas drawn from David Castro's book, Genership 1.0. I'm reading it and deciding how to integrate Castro's thoughts on leadership into my thinking about creativity and problem solving in the nonprofit world.

A 2011 report from the Nonprofit Leadership Alliance listed several competencies that survey respondents said nonprofit leaders would need to pay more attention to in the future:
  • Building and leading teams
  • Developing others
  • Interpersonal skills
  • Working as an effective team member
In 2014, a new leadership competency might need to be cultivated as those challenges haven't completely gone away (and more on that in coming posts).

The point is this: Castro talks about the need for a new form of leadership that fosters collective action rather than being about “leading” people to do something. Castro describes at length what genership is and how to do it. But he starts off by talking about leadership fallacies that undermine effective action: 

1. The Messiah Fallacy
2. The Hero Fallacy
3. The Fallacy of Leadership Nostalgia

All three fallacies center on the myth of a messiah or hero who will lead the people to...something. The fundamental flaw in all cases is that the solution to a leadership challenge is hidden either in history or in the person of the chosen leader.  The hero and messiah will rescue the group and tell them how to get things done. Leadership nostalgia makes the revered leaders' long ago ideas and actions a model.

Each is a fallacy for good reason. Leadership lessons of the past might not apply in today's vastly different social environment. Pining for a hero or a messiah distracts people from working together to design a way to address the organization's challenges. This is what genership is really about. "Genership" is the capacity to create with others, the community practice of creating. 

How is that a leadership model? In short, genership is about facilitating collaboration where old-fashioned leadership is about one person telling the group what do do and why. Genership is based on co-creation, not on pulling people along toward a vision. 

You can read more about Genership 1.0 on the book page at Arch Street Press or at Amazon.com. I don't want to make this blog series into a long book report, so I'll not go into more detail on my points than absolutely necessary.

Next week: Cothinking, covisioning and a report on challenges facing nonprofits in 2014.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

9 Ways Cognitive Bias Undermines Social Change Efforts

This is going to be the first of many posts on how cognitive bias might undermine social change efforts. Yeah, I know. I will do my best to keep this concrete and interesting. A number of quirks in how our brains work might lead to mistaken judgments in many areas relevant to social change: problem analysis, strategy, program design, and advocacy. Maybe fundraising. Taking effective action on a certain problem is what activists want to do, so we'll come back to fundraising later. 1.Confirmation bias may cause us to look for reasons why a certain strategy or tactic is the right one. Supportive evidence gets woven into the narrative, lending support to the need for more education for women or more gun control or whatever the topic might be. Negative information gets tossed out. 2. Bandwagon effect -This may be a real problem when the resources devoted to addressing an issue get all of proportion to the seriousness of an issue. Instead, bandwagon jumping siphons away money and v...
Post a Comment
Read more

Using SWOT Analysis to Rev Up Your Fundraising

Strategic planning, including SWOT analysis, is for small nonprofits, giant philanthropic foundations, and every other nonprofit. Every nonprofit that seeks financial support of any kind needs a strategy.  The point is to make a plan and work the plan. Business gurus have shared a bunch of strategic planning tools, some generic and some made for a specific purpose. This post is about looking at your Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats - SWOT.  Knowing about your organization's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats is step one in planning your fundraising efforts.  SWOT - A Quick Review This is not the best place to run through SWOT analysis, but an overview will make it obvious why we need to do it. First, however, you should write down your fundraising goal. Then, you can do some analysis. Here are the steps: Strengths - What about your financial resources? What about your reputation and your connections? How big is your audience on social medi...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Powerful Tool for Nonprofit Planning 2

This is the time for another post on the social environment of nonprofit organizations. Yes, I know this is a bit esoteric and complex. I’m just going to break things down into a few (more) concrete) posts. Last time I mentioned that your organization’s environment has seven dimensions, each with three elements – capacity, rate of change, complexity. I know I mentioned strategy before, but consider also fundraising, social marketing, and advocacy strategy. To make it easier, here is the table I presented last time: CAPACITY COMPLEXITY DYNAMISM CULTURE ECOLOGY ? ECONOMIC ? DEMOGRAPHIC LEGAL POLITICAL ? TECHNOLOGICAL ? Because 7 X 3 = 21 there are at least that many questions you could ask about your organization’s environment. Last time I posed some generic strategy questions based on the above table. This time I just want to offer some more questions based on the seven dimensions and three elements. From the polit...
Post a Comment
Read more