Skip to main content

A Couple of Nonprofit Success Tools

A Couple of Nonprofit Success Tools

This is a follow-up to my previous post on things I’ve learned reading Genership 1.0: Beyond Leadership Toward Liberating the Creative Soul by David Castro. This particular entry will cover the book’s suggested tools and techniques that can contribute to nonprofit success. Genership 1.0 covers two new approaches to planning and problem solving that are worth adding to any social entrepreneur’s tool kit: CoVisioning and CoThinking.

First, a definition of genership: The capacity to create with others, the community practice of creating. Castro’s book elaborates on this concept and breaks down some myths of leadership.

The old model of leadership involves one man or woman creating a vision and a strategy, maybe some tactics, and getting people to go along with that strategy. Genership is all about working with others in a shared atmosphere of figuring out what needs to be done, how it should be done, and why it needs to be done.

Creating a Shared Vision:

CoVisioning is the process of thinking with others about desired changes to reality, to paraphrase Genership 1.0. The usual tools for brainstorming and problem analysis can be useful in creating a vision. CoVisioning involves a philosophical perspective or frame of reference.

While any sensible leader will check with his or her superiors for guidance in creating a project plan, CoVisioning begs more of a group involvement in deciding what might be done. Think of collaboration instead of persuading or inspiring. For example, in lieu of urging others to “Follow me, and let’s save the Cumberland River watershed,” a CoVisioning effort might focus a group’s attention on what their part of the Cumberland River watershed could/should look like. The traditional leader might picture a certain program, perhaps one inspired by other watershed conservation efforts in other parts of the United States.

Thinking Collaboratively:

CoThinking is the art of engaging in reflective dialogue about a desired future, present circumstances and the possibilities for strategic action toward that desired future. CoThinking is a strategic planning tool; think of it as a practical counterpart to the philosophical practice of CoVisioning.

A traditional leader would create a plan and focus his or her efforts on inspiring or persuading people to adopt that plan as their own vision for a better future. CoThinking in this scenario would entail discussing the watershed area, and what might be done to make it better (cleaner, healthier, etc.). One should engage in CoThinking after either personally seeking further information about watershed conservation, or after finding an initial group to engage with that possesses a working knowledge of the subject.

Once you’ve decided to engage in CoThinking, you have access to a variety of tools for brainstorming and planning. I’ve written about provocative operations and concept mapping as tools for generating ideas.

Thinking Differently:

This stuff does require a shift in mindset, from being the leader to being the facilitator, coordinator and liaison with outside parties.


Naturally, Genership 1.0 goes into more detail about how to implement CoThinking and CoVisioning. So, regardless of whether you are the founder and leader of a small group, or a C-level executive in a major nonprofit, your position still offers opportunities for co-creating new plans and strategies.  
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

9 Ways Cognitive Bias Undermines Social Change Efforts

This is going to be the first of many posts on how cognitive bias might undermine social change efforts. Yeah, I know. I will do my best to keep this concrete and interesting. A number of quirks in how our brains work might lead to mistaken judgments in many areas relevant to social change: problem analysis, strategy, program design, and advocacy. Maybe fundraising. Taking effective action on a certain problem is what activists want to do, so we'll come back to fundraising later. 1.Confirmation bias may cause us to look for reasons why a certain strategy or tactic is the right one. Supportive evidence gets woven into the narrative, lending support to the need for more education for women or more gun control or whatever the topic might be. Negative information gets tossed out. 2. Bandwagon effect -This may be a real problem when the resources devoted to addressing an issue get all of proportion to the seriousness of an issue. Instead, bandwagon jumping siphons away money and v...
Post a Comment
Read more

Using SWOT Analysis to Rev Up Your Fundraising

Strategic planning, including SWOT analysis, is for small nonprofits, giant philanthropic foundations, and every other nonprofit. Every nonprofit that seeks financial support of any kind needs a strategy.  The point is to make a plan and work the plan. Business gurus have shared a bunch of strategic planning tools, some generic and some made for a specific purpose. This post is about looking at your Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats - SWOT.  Knowing about your organization's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats is step one in planning your fundraising efforts.  SWOT - A Quick Review This is not the best place to run through SWOT analysis, but an overview will make it obvious why we need to do it. First, however, you should write down your fundraising goal. Then, you can do some analysis. Here are the steps: Strengths - What about your financial resources? What about your reputation and your connections? How big is your audience on social medi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fundraising Ideas

Raising money is a perennial challenge for nonprofits. The Great Recession has made things tougher for some and nearly impossible for others. Your nonprofit may be working hard to deal with fundraising challenges. Traditional thinking about fundraising might lead to thinking like this - “We need to raise $600,000 more money third year. What do we need to do to make this happen?” A discussion of grant writers, fundraising consultants and mailing lists follows. There is nothing wrong with this approach. At least some of that discussion needs to happen. But, new thinking might also be needed. Lateral thinking may help you get better results. Lateral thinking is (from Wikipedia) “solving problems through an indirect and creative approach.” The point of lateral thinking is to move “sideways” to new ideas and different ways of thinking. The point of this little essay is to point out another way of approaching the subject of fundraising. Lateral thinking itself suggests a broader approach to ...
Post a Comment
Read more