Skip to main content

Collaborative Thinking is a Social Change Tool


This is another in a series of posts devoted to concepts that David Castro introduces in his book Genership 1.0 Beyond Leadership, Toward Liberating the Creative Soul. Strategic thinking is the subject this time. While the practice of strategic thinking is well known, the standard approach to it can be improved.

A new way of thinking collaboratively thinking about the future promises improved results from strategic planning sessions. CoThinking is Castro's term for that new way of thinking. To quote Castro, CoThinking is a process whereby “We engage with others in reflective dialogue our desired future, our present circumstances, and the possibilities for strategic action.”

Instead of trying to predict the future, concentrate on what future to create and how that work might be accomplished. Whether two people are talking about maybe starting a nonprofit, or a long-established development organization is ready to expand into new territories, thinking about the future is a necessity. Strategic thinking is a necessity, as are the tools for doing effective creative thinking.

Planning tools such as SWOT analysis or Delphi polling can be valuable sometimes. Often, social entrepreneurs can rely on their knowledge of what is changing at the time and what is reasonably likely to happen in the near future. Is now really a good time to start building village-scale power plants in rural Cameroon? Knowing the social environment in Cameroon should make the question an easy one.

Predicting the future might be useful, but creating a detailed map of what to do and how to do it, is more important. This is what CoThinking is for.


In the Genership model of doing things, there is no one way to envision the future. Castro refers to the journey metaphor here. Getting from where your nonprofit is to where you want to it to be is NOT like a journey. There is no organizational planning equivalent of MapQuest. Individuals should focus on creative efforts to find ways of reaching a desired destination.

CoThinking provides a method for planning in that “create-it-yourself” mold. To that end, CoThinking uses three “domains of thinking”:

  1. Think about the desired future – Here is where the ability to articulate a SMART goal, that the team agrees on will be crucial. What does the group want the future to look like? How many projects serving how many people by what date?
  2. Think about reality in light of that desired future – Scan the group's experience and knowledge of the current social environment, and discuss the group's assessments of same. What resources does the group still need to acquire? Information and skills count as resources too.
  3. Engage in practical planning, execution and evaluation of a certain action – Plan interim objectives and action steps, evaluation criteria, and first steps then take action.

CoThinking is not that difficult to understand, but some effort is required. Read Genership 1.0, Chapter 3 in particular, to find out why CoThinking is a good idea and how exactly it works.

Comments, suggestions or ideas? Feel free to post a comment, and share this post.   
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

9 Ways Cognitive Bias Undermines Social Change Efforts

This is going to be the first of many posts on how cognitive bias might undermine social change efforts. Yeah, I know. I will do my best to keep this concrete and interesting. A number of quirks in how our brains work might lead to mistaken judgments in many areas relevant to social change: problem analysis, strategy, program design, and advocacy. Maybe fundraising. Taking effective action on a certain problem is what activists want to do, so we'll come back to fundraising later. 1.Confirmation bias may cause us to look for reasons why a certain strategy or tactic is the right one. Supportive evidence gets woven into the narrative, lending support to the need for more education for women or more gun control or whatever the topic might be. Negative information gets tossed out. 2. Bandwagon effect -This may be a real problem when the resources devoted to addressing an issue get all of proportion to the seriousness of an issue. Instead, bandwagon jumping siphons away money and v...
Post a Comment
Read more

Using SWOT Analysis to Rev Up Your Fundraising

Strategic planning, including SWOT analysis, is for small nonprofits, giant philanthropic foundations, and every other nonprofit. Every nonprofit that seeks financial support of any kind needs a strategy.  The point is to make a plan and work the plan. Business gurus have shared a bunch of strategic planning tools, some generic and some made for a specific purpose. This post is about looking at your Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats - SWOT.  Knowing about your organization's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats is step one in planning your fundraising efforts.  SWOT - A Quick Review This is not the best place to run through SWOT analysis, but an overview will make it obvious why we need to do it. First, however, you should write down your fundraising goal. Then, you can do some analysis. Here are the steps: Strengths - What about your financial resources? What about your reputation and your connections? How big is your audience on social medi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fundraising Ideas

Raising money is a perennial challenge for nonprofits. The Great Recession has made things tougher for some and nearly impossible for others. Your nonprofit may be working hard to deal with fundraising challenges. Traditional thinking about fundraising might lead to thinking like this - “We need to raise $600,000 more money third year. What do we need to do to make this happen?” A discussion of grant writers, fundraising consultants and mailing lists follows. There is nothing wrong with this approach. At least some of that discussion needs to happen. But, new thinking might also be needed. Lateral thinking may help you get better results. Lateral thinking is (from Wikipedia) “solving problems through an indirect and creative approach.” The point of lateral thinking is to move “sideways” to new ideas and different ways of thinking. The point of this little essay is to point out another way of approaching the subject of fundraising. Lateral thinking itself suggests a broader approach to ...
Post a Comment
Read more