Skip to main content

Collaborative Thinking as a Social Change Tool



Genership 1.0: Beyond Leadership Toward Liberating the Creative Soul by David Castro describes some tactics for approaching social innovation in a creative, collaborative way. This post introduces three specific ways of thinking collaboratively, or individually, about social change efforts. Castro offers much more detail on using leverage, systems thinking and design thinking.

Three Approaches to Thinking about Social Change:

Whenever a group of social entrepreneurs gets together to plan or problem solve, they can choose to adopt one or more modes of thinking about the challenge at hand. The three modes of thinking that Castro mentions each deserves a book or two, but an introduction is easy to supply:

1. Looking for Leverage - This is a social change approach I’ve advocated for in previous posts. Activists should look for places they can intervene in society to produce the most benefit for the resources invested. A deep familiarity with the problem might be enough to suggest ways to intervene to produce a maximum benefit.
2. Systems Thinking - All social problems have multiple causes and effects. A number of factors doubtlessly influence the problem, making it worse in some circumstances and better in others. To be effective activists requires at least a basic understanding of the system in question. The group needs to look at interrelationships between parts of the system.
3. Design Thinking - Consider how the possible solution will fit into the social environment by developing elements that match the needs of the population. Several posts in this blog have addressed design thinking in more detail.

Creative thinking should be an element of collaborative thinking about how to affect social change. Some groups use an unsophisticated process of just coming up with ideas. A formal approach to generating ideas is almost always going to give better results. Brainstorming techniques like concept mapping or morphological analysis can serve the group well. The group could use SCAMPER to refine or combine promising ideas.

Addressing Gun Violence:

A standard approach to gun violence might be to simply advocate for tougher gun laws. Maybe the city government can ban concealed carry or Congress can expand on the so-called assault weapons ban. Those approaches represent a search for leverage, a way to use the existing system to affect a reduction in gun violence.

A bit of systems thinking would reveal some insights about the factors that influence rates of gun violence for better or for worse. This work might reveal something that could be more easily addressed than gun laws. Perhaps lots of young men don’t have anything constructive to do for money, or just to pass the time, end up running with gangs. A program to address that problem might give us a new design to address gun violence.

A bit of collaborative thinking could produce new ways to gain leverage, or a new social program or policy that offers a new way of dealing with the causes of gun violence.


Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

9 Ways Cognitive Bias Undermines Social Change Efforts

This is going to be the first of many posts on how cognitive bias might undermine social change efforts. Yeah, I know. I will do my best to keep this concrete and interesting. A number of quirks in how our brains work might lead to mistaken judgments in many areas relevant to social change: problem analysis, strategy, program design, and advocacy. Maybe fundraising. Taking effective action on a certain problem is what activists want to do, so we'll come back to fundraising later. 1.Confirmation bias may cause us to look for reasons why a certain strategy or tactic is the right one. Supportive evidence gets woven into the narrative, lending support to the need for more education for women or more gun control or whatever the topic might be. Negative information gets tossed out. 2. Bandwagon effect -This may be a real problem when the resources devoted to addressing an issue get all of proportion to the seriousness of an issue. Instead, bandwagon jumping siphons away money and v...
Post a Comment
Read more

Using SWOT Analysis to Rev Up Your Fundraising

Strategic planning, including SWOT analysis, is for small nonprofits, giant philanthropic foundations, and every other nonprofit. Every nonprofit that seeks financial support of any kind needs a strategy.  The point is to make a plan and work the plan. Business gurus have shared a bunch of strategic planning tools, some generic and some made for a specific purpose. This post is about looking at your Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats - SWOT.  Knowing about your organization's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats is step one in planning your fundraising efforts.  SWOT - A Quick Review This is not the best place to run through SWOT analysis, but an overview will make it obvious why we need to do it. First, however, you should write down your fundraising goal. Then, you can do some analysis. Here are the steps: Strengths - What about your financial resources? What about your reputation and your connections? How big is your audience on social medi...
Post a Comment
Read more

A Powerful Tool for Nonprofit Planning 2

This is the time for another post on the social environment of nonprofit organizations. Yes, I know this is a bit esoteric and complex. I’m just going to break things down into a few (more) concrete) posts. Last time I mentioned that your organization’s environment has seven dimensions, each with three elements – capacity, rate of change, complexity. I know I mentioned strategy before, but consider also fundraising, social marketing, and advocacy strategy. To make it easier, here is the table I presented last time: CAPACITY COMPLEXITY DYNAMISM CULTURE ECOLOGY ? ECONOMIC ? DEMOGRAPHIC LEGAL POLITICAL ? TECHNOLOGICAL ? Because 7 X 3 = 21 there are at least that many questions you could ask about your organization’s environment. Last time I posed some generic strategy questions based on the above table. This time I just want to offer some more questions based on the seven dimensions and three elements. From the polit...
Post a Comment
Read more