Skip to main content

A Business Creativity Book Review, 1 of .... a Bunch

This is the first of many book reviews I plan to post, pulled from an old blog of mine because nobody will go hunting for my review of Thinkertoys (Micheal Michalko).

Michalko's book is really divided into five sections. Section one is mostly an introduction to creative problem solving. His most useful chapter describes different ways of exploring a challenge (problem/opportunity) facing you or your organization.

The second and third sections describe a dizzying array of tools for generating ideas, either in a logical way or through intuitive methods that more closely match what we usually think of as brainstorming - Sit down for some time alone and think of fundraising ideas. You might enjoy experimenting with multiple idea generating techniques, considering that Thinkertoys describes 31 brainstorming techniques there are certainly plenty of options.

Section four covers some group brainstorming techniques. I've never tried any of the three group brainstorming techniques Michalko describes. And I've never found an account of how well they work. So, if you want to experiment you and see how the results compare with regular old group brainstorming you may well be breaking new ground.

Section five covers methods of evaluating ideas. That's an important step in the whole idea generation process. Many ideas that appear promising at first are actually bad ideas.

Maybe the book is too new to call a classic, but it has been in print for many years and is now in its second edition. Thinkertoys gets mentioned in many recommended book lists on Amazon.com and elsewhere. Those two facts are enough to make one think that Thinkertoys might be useful to people in the nonprofit world.

Final Verdict: Get a used copy from Amazon.com and at least skim all of sections two, three, and four. Read section one carefully.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Using SWOT Analysis to Rev Up Your Fundraising

Strategic planning, including SWOT analysis, is for small nonprofits, giant philanthropic foundations, and every other nonprofit. Every nonprofit that seeks financial support of any kind needs a strategy.  The point is to make a plan and work the plan. Business gurus have shared a bunch of strategic planning tools, some generic and some made for a specific purpose. This post is about looking at your Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats - SWOT.  Knowing about your organization's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats is step one in planning your fundraising efforts.  SWOT - A Quick Review This is not the best place to run through SWOT analysis, but an overview will make it obvious why we need to do it. First, however, you should write down your fundraising goal. Then, you can do some analysis. Here are the steps: Strengths - What about your financial resources? What about your reputation and your connections? How big is your audience on social medi...

Program Design Tips That Really Work

Program Design Are there better ways to start or improve nonprofit programs? This blog is about building better nonprofits, so you probably hope I'll have more answers than questions. I do. I've written about many brainstorming techniques that you might be able to employ generically for dealing with any nonprofit challenge. This post summarizes some of those ideas and explains how to apply them to program design. A simple desire to challenge ideas, assumptions, and requirements would be a good place to start. What are the assumptions and usual requirements for a certain type of program? Write them down and examine each one to see if it is valid. Verify that each requirement is really a requirement now, and not a bad assumption or an outmoded idea. Spend about 10 minutes on this exercise.. Break down program design into component parts and look at each of the components. using either stratals or the filament technique. The filament technique calls for writing down the us...

9 Ways Cognitive Bias Undermines Social Change Efforts

This is going to be the first of many posts on how cognitive bias might undermine social change efforts. Yeah, I know. I will do my best to keep this concrete and interesting. A number of quirks in how our brains work might lead to mistaken judgments in many areas relevant to social change: problem analysis, strategy, program design, and advocacy. Maybe fundraising. Taking effective action on a certain problem is what activists want to do, so we'll come back to fundraising later. 1.Confirmation bias may cause us to look for reasons why a certain strategy or tactic is the right one. Supportive evidence gets woven into the narrative, lending support to the need for more education for women or more gun control or whatever the topic might be. Negative information gets tossed out. 2. Bandwagon effect -This may be a real problem when the resources devoted to addressing an issue get all of proportion to the seriousness of an issue. Instead, bandwagon jumping siphons away money and v...